Friday, September 20, 2013

Ban Ki-Moon Accused of Union-Busting at UN

IBEW Local 1212 Business Manager Ralph Avigliano and Business Reps John Costa, Vincent Butler and Executive Board member Phil Doyle are seen here attending a rally outside of the United Nations for their Anti-Union policy. The demonstration by  local union leaders stands up for the loss of jobs in the IBEW Local 1212 and Local 3. Members who proudly served the United Nations for over 65 years.

United Nations workers spend their time on the front lines of the global struggle for human rights, but now they are battling for rights in their own workplace. The UN has come under fire for union-busting, and the labor standoff could undermine its ability to uphold the rights of others around the globe.

All summer, the United Nations' staff unions have been clashing with management over a new policy aimed at curtailing the staff’s collective bargaining rights. The Staff Coordinating Council, the union leading the opposition campaign, contends that the loss of this negotiating power, enacted by Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, would deal an unprecedented blow to the union’s power to negotiate contracts and working conditions.

The dismantling of union power, in turn, may signal a gradual shift away from democracy and toward neoliberalism throughout the institution often hailed as the world's watchdog.

The conflict began last spring, after the General Assembly issued a general order for the secretary general to revise rules for the Staff-Management Coordinating Committee, the current forum for collective bargaining talks. Ban then issued reforms that reduce the committee’s role in the negotiations to, essentially, an advisor—which the Council says is tantamount to “removing the right of staff unions to negotiate.”

According to the unions, when they declared the reforms unacceptable, management broke off talks. In July, the UN went ahead and enacted the rules. According to the Staff Coordinating Council , Ban had made far more drastic policy revisions than what the General Assembly had mandated. They say the order simply serves as a pretext for Ban to undermine the union’s influence, and that he has operated outside of the UN legal framework, which would require him to “seek mediation before consolidating this mandate."

Now, UN employees—from office staff to peacekeepers to humanitarian aid workers—are waiting anxiously to see how the reforms will affect their power to determine the conditions of their work in a massive global governing structure.

Prior to the new policy, UN staff's contract negotiations were similar to that of civil service unions in many member states, though the negotiations were not completely binding since the General Assembly could technically override the labor agreements. The loss of these collective bargaining rights has provoked international outcry from labor advocates, including the International Trades Union Congress.

Collective bargaining: A human right?

Union advocates say cutting collective bargaining will impact workers' ability to respond effectively to crises, especially in war and disaster zones, where the UN is often the most dependable source of relief:
In order to continue this work, staff must feel valued and treated with the same dignity the UN encourages other organizations to treat their staff. Without a fully motivated and engaged staff, the results on the ground will change dramatically. The workforce of the UN is dedicated to its mission…. Everyone has the same goal.
Many labor issues are effectively on hold due to the breakdown of the talks. The staff union had wanted to address concerns over the UN’s the growing reliance on private security contractors in its military missions. Unions were also demanding “better protection for whistle-blowers” and stronger oversight mechanisms, and “a workable screening system” to prevent agencies from employing people convicted of war crimes and other human rights violations.

Critics have stressed the irony that the UN’s own humanitarian campaigns often cite labor rights and collective bargaining as part of its founding human rights principles. (By contrast, the staff of the International Labour Organization, the global labor-rights monitoring body, is unionized with collective bargaining.) 

The anti-union shift at the UN seems to run counter to its outspoken stance on labor rights in the private sector, such as its recent criticism of Bangladesh’s weak worker protections following the Rana Plaza factory disaster. The UN Global Compact, an initiative that advises businesses on human rights issues, proclaims that “Businesses should uphold the freedom of association and the effective recognition of the right to collective bargaining."

The Staff Coordinating Council cites longstanding decrees on the right to union representation that enshrine collective bargaining as a universal right for all workers. Speaking by phone from Geneva, Staff Management Committee Vice President Ian Richards tells Working In These Times, "We think it's clear that whether you're bound by national laws or not, you should have the right to collective bargaining.”

Neoliberal humanitarianism?

This is, of course, not the first time the UN has come under fire for political hypocrisy—in recent years, agencies, both staff and leadership, have been scandalized by various cases of human rights violations, including misconduct by peacekeeping forces.

But the new labor policy is more than just the UN's failure to walk the talk on labor rights. The reforms seem to reflect a global neoliberal trend among some member states. The undermining of collective bargaining at the UN follows labor crises in public sector unions in Europe and echoes Wisconsin’s pivotal anti-union law.

Unions argue that it reflects a general pattern of eroding job quality and security at critical agencies, and ultimately, will damage the staff's effectiveness. In Richards's view, UN workers’ rights have been quietly deteriorating amid a trend toward privatization: While agency budgets are threatened by deep cuts, the UN's military missions increasingly rely on controversial private contractors like UK-based security firm G4S. Many staff have chafed at the administration’s restrictive “mobility policy,” which governs staff members’ freedom to change positions within the organization.

The situation is especially precarious for local field office workers. In conflict or disaster-stricken areas, Richards says: “For those who are locally employed... those [UN jobs] are about the only reliable kind of jobs you can get, especially if you have some kind of education.” But they are vulnerable to violence and the volatility of geopolitics. In Iraq, for example, if the UN withdraws foreign personnel and local workers are left behind, Richards warns, “Who looks after them? Are they going to be retaliated against?... There's no current way of negotiating with [the management] on that.”

Ironically, the labor dispute has emerged just as the UN revisits a historical moment of crisis facing its workers: Last month the UN marked the tenth anniversary of the bombing in Baghdad that killed 22 staff members. Ban's commemoration speech, quoted in the New York Times, specifically referenced the need to address security threats to field staff : "We have learned from our losses… We are changing the way we operate around the world."
But the UN staff's advocates see the loss of collective bargaining rights as a change in exactly the opposite direction—a measure that will make staff physically, as well as economically, less secure, in working conditions that are by definition fraught with instability.
Given its symbolism on the global stage, Richards says, “The UN is supposed to set an example to the world. Right now on labor rights, it isn't."

Michelle Chen is a contributing editor at In These Times, a contributor to Working In These Times, and an editor at CultureStrike. She is also a co-producer of Asia Pacific Forum on Pacifica's WBAI. Her work has appeared on Alternet,, Ms., and The Nation, Newsday, and her old zine, cain. Follow her on Twitter at @meeshellchen or reach her at michellechen [at] inthesetimes [dot] com.

Wednesday, September 4, 2013

Journeys' Mall Staff Quits In Most Epic Way Possible

The Huffington Post  |  By

 This will make you think twice before treating your workers poorly. 

Mall Staff Quits
It goes without saying that employees should be treated fairly. But sometimes employers need a more blunt lesson in the importance of worker appreciation. This photo, which was posted on Reddit Saturday, is a wake-up call to all the ungrateful bosses out there. 

"We take situations like this seriously and are currently investigating this issue. Beyond this, we have no comment," Journeys' director of corporate relations Claire McCall told The Huffington Post over the phone.

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

Turmoil Persists at WPIX; Managers Have ‘No Clue’

Despite the ray of hope of Scott Stanford set to become a full-time news anchor with Tamsen Fadal, WPIX is still the home of eggshells and awkwardness.

Since that mega announcement, Tuned In has learned that reporter Hilary Whittier was fired yesterday. But news director Mark Effron was forced to do a temporary about face. The station realized that she couldn’t be axed without alerting the unions, two in fact. Instead, she’ll report to the newsroom for the next 30 days, likely without being seen on the air.
“She’s a nice person, but too green for the streets of New York,” one source contends.

Whittier, as a multimedia journalist, is a rare commodity. She shoots her own pieces, except when doing a story live. We’re told that Whittier, with PIX since 2011, was to be fired because they don’t like her work or her personality.

There was another behind-the-scenes maneuver today. Morning news executive producer Howard Dorsey resigned. His departure had been rumored for several weeks as, sources say, this was not Dorsey’s decision. He started at Channel 11 in 2010. Senior executive producer Sharon von Zweiten is expected to fill the gap on an interim basis.

Effron has also decided to make WPIX the alternate news station for New York City. We’re told he discussed the issue last week, placing a moratorium on the use of stories outside of the five boroughs. An insider says the concentration of coverage will be Brooklyn and Queens, “as that’s where the meters are.”

Effron addressed staffers by saying that he doesn’t care about New Jersey, Long Island, Westchester and the Hudson Valley. “They’re not New Yorkers.”

“We just looked at each other. Unbelievable,” the insider says.

Case in point, yesterday’s power outage in Elmont, Long Island caused by man driving a bucket truck recklessly. Managing editor Amy Waldman flipped out that the station wasn’t on the scene. 

Confusion rained down on the Tribune O&O. One staffer was overheard asking Waldman, “I thought we don’t cover Long Island?”

Although Effron appears to be the orchestrator all changes at PIX, sources say, Tribune brass are carefully watching every move he makes.

“Mark can not make a decision unless he gets clearance from the 10th floor,”  the insider says. “Mark can’t do anything unless he asks permission. I’m surprised he doesn’t ask permission to go to the bathroom.”

In yet another reversal from the Bill Carey-era at PIX, Effron recently removed Lionel from the PIX Morning News, where he was host of sorts from 4 to 6 a.m. He’ll do commentary and other segments during the 5 and 10 p.m. broadcasts. He’ll also starting to do pieces out in the field.
We’re hearing that WPIX, while never a ratings winner, is suffering in the year-to-year figures since  Fadal assumed the evening role late last year and Effron was hired in April. 

Furthermore, the morning show has been dramatically sliding since Sukanya Krishnan went on maternity leave. This week, it was confirmed that Fox Chicago anchor Kori Chambers, a story that Tuned In told you first,  has been named co-anchor opposite Krishnan. Frances Rivera leaves the station tomorrow.

Separately, this might not be an example of poor decision making, but of negligence, WPIX recently got caught without having its vehicles being properly insured. There was an incident in Hoboken, which resulted in police impounding the truck before a live morning show segment last week. It was discovered the registration had been suspended because of an insurance problem.

Thereafter, WPIX checked the other vehicles, and Tuned In has learned, the majority were in error without the proper paperwork required. In the few hours until the matter was rectified, Channel 11 newsroom opted to act like the Keystone Kops.

“Amy tried to convince people to take a cab to go to a story,” an insider says. “You’ve got to be kidding me, right?”

Effron promoted Waldman from executive producer of special projects in June.

“These three people have no clue what is going on,” an insider admits.

“In 2 1/2 years, I had no idea what [Amy] ever did,”  the insider says. “If these three people remain in place, you would never have any DMA [designated market area]. There would be [no ratings] all day long. It’s just so bad.”

Story from: 

Tuned In

Examining the World of New York's Local TV and Radio Scene