Monday, October 10, 2011

Entertainment Unions Join Occupy Wall Street

On Wednesday, Members of labor unions joined the Occupy Wall Street protest in force. More than 6,000 union members rallied at Foley Square before marching down to Wall Street.

Local One Member Bob Daraio with Local 52 Member Eric Gerrity
IATSE Local One stagehands; Studio Mechanics from IATSE Local 52; Camera Operators from IATSE Local 600; Wardrobe crews from IATSE Local 764; FOX5 Broadcast Engineers from IATSE Local 798; and Designers from IATSE Local 829 marched along with Broadcast Engineers from IBEW Local 1212 and NABET-CWA Locals 11 and 16; WGAE Writers; Actors from SAG, AFTRA, AEA, and Musicians from Local 802.


Allison Kilkenny The Nation
 
Thousands of protesters gathered in Foley Square today as part of Occupy Wall Street’s largest event to date. Unions from the Transport Workers Union, SEIU 1199, and the United Federation of Teachers all joined the protest to voice their discontent at what they call a bailout of Wall Street, while working-class people are left to suffer under a system of austerity.

Ayman El-Sayed, a member of the nurses union, said he came to the protest to stand in solidarity with the Liberty Plaza activists.  El-Sayed is having difficulty finding steady work in New York City, but he still tries to protest in between job-hunting.

“I come before work, I come after work when I can, but I find this Occupy Wall Street movement is important because it will help future workers: better benefits, get better jobs, get more stability, and not be neglected by their government, which bails out banks instead of bailing out workers.”

El-Sayed mentions the negative consequences of the city’s budget cuts, including the closing of the 400-bed St. Vincent Catholic Medical Centers, which sealed its doors back in April.

“I wanted to be a nurse to contribute to my community, so I could pay my mortgage, pay my bills, raise my kids, but also help people and help my community,” he explains before addressing the media’s negative depiction of some of the protesters as pot-smoking hippies engaging in an endless drum circle.

“God bless these youth who are out here, because while I’m at work, they can hold it down till I can get off work and come down and stand with them. Everybody plays a role. Even if some of them are hippies, they’re Americans. They have a right to speak their opinion. I don’t care how they dress or what they do,” he says.

 El-Sayed mentions he doesn’t believe either political party represents his interests, or “normal working people’s interests.” In fact, he’d like to see an independent movement grow from OWS. “I believe in third parties. I just hope we can build something out of this movement here—an alternative to the two-party system”

Witnessing OWS’s evolution over the course of only a few weeks is truly something to behold. In the first few days of the movement, it was extremely difficult to find accurate information about what the protesters stood for, or what was planned for the movement that day, let alone over the span of a longer arc. Now, Liberty Plaza is neatly divided into sections: the greeting desk where you can see the day’s schedule; the supply drop-off area where supporters can leave clean blankets, sleeping bags, and clothing; and then there’s the food and media centers. The group even has a press team that mingles during events to address any questions the media might have.

OWS also has its own newspaper now, the Occupy Wall Street Journal, available as a .pdf file here, though some observers have criticized the publication for its almost entirely male perspective.

While many unions attended the event in an official capacity, I ran into a couple young men who attended the protest sporting their union gear, even though their own local hadn’t voted to officially throw their weight behind OWS.

As members of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, William and Carlos wanted to stand in solidarity with the young people of Liberty Plaza even as their union leaders drag their feet. William declared his intention to do so because to do anything but come down to the protest would be “complete cowardice.”

“We believe the union movement should be more involved in this protest,” William says. “We’re out here to show a lot of us are grassroots, democratically minded, and we do want to bring a union face to this movement.”

William blames a certain degree of anti-protest fervor among union members on an inflated sense of machismo. According to him, ever since Vietnam, when hard hats flooded the streets for the sole purpose of beating up young protesting college students, unions have sometimes adopted a sense of hostility toward activist youths.

“There’s always been this macho culture,” he says, “but I think there’s a more progressive slant moving into the union right now. At least, the people I’ve spoken with on my job support what I’m doing. Not all of them took the pay cut to come here.” (William had to leave work three hours early and had to sacrifice the remainder of his day’s wages to do so).

Carlos’s boss asked him if he was going to “join the hippies” when he announced his intent to join OWS. “I was like, no, we’re part of the 99 percent. If you have any kind of debt whatsoever, you’re part of the 99 percent.”

William nods in agreement. “I consider myself a patriotic person, and this is a patriotic protest…. [The protesters are] not anti-America. They’re trying to save America.”

“It’s like a generation is calling and you’re not gonna answer it?” Carlos asks a hypothetical naysayer, sitting on the couch at home. “That’s all I have to say.”

Mark Mannis, Marge Harrison and Helene Mannis, three retired schoolteachers, stand together at Foley Square, the end point of the OWS march. Mark used to teach in Queens, and says he came to the protest to support young people. “In our generation, things have been very good to us. We’re union members. Everything we are today is because we’re union members, and kids don’t have any possibility to progress at all,” he says.

His companion, Marge, is a retired schoolteacher from Nassau County, and she came to take part in the infectious spirit of the movement.

“I’m just so thrilled that the young people in the occupation have just sent an electric jolt of optimism through people who have been organizing for years around Afghanistan, Iraq, the budget, the deficit, all these issues that we’re confronting,” she says, adding that the right to collectively bargain is an essential right because without it, “you’re just flailing around.”

Helene chimes in that she agrees. “I’ve been waiting for the young people to finally rise up and really realize how the right wing is destroying this country, and all the dreams that people had for having a great America and caring about other people, and doing what’s right: taking care of the weaker. Not just taking care of the rich and powerful and the rest of us just get the crumbs on the floor.”

Various right-wing websites have depicted the unions’ decisions to join OWS as a sign that the traditional vehicle of the left, labor, plans to hijack the movement to implement their dastardly plan of ensuring pension plans and healthcare for all workers.

However, OWS organizers don’t see that nefarious plan as being possible, or even, you know, real.

Jeff Smith, an OWS organizer, seemed confused at the idea. “I don’t think there’s any chance of that, frankly,” he says.

A member of the press team for Occupy Wall Street, Mark Bray, agrees. “If you just look at it logistically, you look at where we’re set up, you look at the park, you look at what we actually do on a day-by-day basis with the General Assemblies, I don’t know how they would do that,” he says. “They’re using Occupy Wall Street as a means to get their message out and we welcome that.”

Bankruptcy Judge Lets Tribune Co. Make Lofty Executive Bonus Payments, Again!


In a move that is sure to draw the ire of the Tribune Company’s critics, a bankruptcy judge in Delaware recently allowed Tribune Co. to distribute millions of dollars in bonuses to its top managers. 

According to a report in the Washington Post, Tribune Co. justified its lavish bonuses by saying it needed to compensate its top employees for their efforts in keeping the company afloat while it trudged through bankruptcy proceedings. 

The giant media company, which owns several newspapers, including the Chicago Tribune and the Los Angeles Times, faced a financial catastrophe in recent years as a shift in the media landscape undercut newspapers' traditional revenue streams. 

With more content available for free or at little cost on the Internet, traditional newspapers have scrambled to compete with low-cost information sources.

In addition, the recent decrease in newspaper readership has led to a loss in advertisement, which has crippled the finances of major metropolitan newspapers like the Chicago Tribune. 

In the midst of this financial crisis, the Tribune Co. filed for bankruptcy in 2008, shortly after a buyout of the company led by Sam Zell left Tribune Co. drowning in debt. 
 
The newspaper company has been shedding jobs at a rapid pace over the past few years, which makes the recent round of bonuses a bit controversial, observers say. 

Under the plan approved by the bankruptcy judge, Tribune Co. plans to distribute tens of millions of dollars to a few hundred top managers, provided that they meet certain performance objectives. 

In the meantime, the bankruptcy court is weighing the merits of the company's proposed reorganization plan, which would likely shield it from payment demands by numerous creditors. 

Critics of the proposed plan claim that the current reorganization plan would needlessly protect the lenders that funded the ill-conceived buyout of the company in 2008. Tribune Co.'s poorly timed bonus payments have only added to the frustrations shared by former employees of the company. 

Thus, while the payment of bonuses during bankruptcy does not violate any bankruptcy law, it certainly hasn't helped the company's reputation in the court of public opinion.

The management incentive plan calls for some 640 employees to share $16 million to $42 million if they hit certain financial targets.

Despite continued under-performance in the publishing unit, Tribune Co. management is projecting it will be able to generate about $517 million in cash flow in 2011, $20 million more than originally projected

Tribune Settles $37.5 Mill Tax Claim Related to 2007 Leveraged Buyout For $ 7 Mill

By Steven Church
Bloomberg Business Week
Tribune Co., the biggest media company in bankruptcy, agreed to pay the Internal Revenue Service $7 million to settle allegations that the company’s 2007 leveraged buyout violated U.S. tax law. 

The settlement ends a fight over whether the company must pay $37.5 million to the IRS, which alleged that the company owed unpaid taxes related to its almost $13 billion leveraged buyout.

The deal “resolves a major outstanding claim against Tribune on very favorable terms to the debtors,” the company said in court papers filed today in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Wilmington, Delaware. 

Tribune filed for bankruptcy in 2008, one year after billionaire Sam Zell led a buyout that added more than $8 billion in debt onto the Chicago-based company. Tribune owns newspapers including the Los Angeles Times the Chicago Tribune, along with television and radio stations.

Two groups of hedge funds are waiting for U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Kevin J. Carey to pick one of two competing plans to reorganize the company so it can leave bankruptcy. 

The IRS claim was related to the structure of the deal, which was designed to avoid some federal taxes. 

The bankruptcy case is In re Tribune Co., 08-bk-13141, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware (Wilmington). 

--Editors: Mary Romano, Michael Hytha 

To contact the reporter on this story: Steven Church in Wilmington at schurch3@bloomberg.net 

To contact the editor responsible for this story: John Pickering at jpickering@bloomberg.net 

Monday, October 3, 2011

Over 100 NYPD Officers Refuse to Work in Support of Occupy Wall Street Movement

The Occupy Wall Street movement issued the following statement on their website:
"Today we received unconfirmed reports that over one hundred blue collar police refused to come into work in solidarity with our movement. These numbers will grow. We are the 99 percent. You will not silence us."

The Occupy Wall Street movement is growing and has expanded to cover other cities, such as Los Angeles, CA and Chicago, IL, with numerous protests scheduled for other cities, such as Sarasota, FL, Washington DC, Lexington, Kentucky and San Francisco, California.

Occupy Washington, D.C. begins on October 6, 2011

The movement has moved into a global position with the new Occupy Together website, which organizes occupation protests from around the world.

It is with hope and intent that the officers who are using excessive force on peaceful protestors realize that the only ones they are hurting is themselves through the destruction of the Constitution and the right for free speech. As the Occupy Wall Street movement grows, it is hopeful that officers from other cities will join in on the side of humanity and peace.

For news you won't see on the main stream media, stay tuned to in5d alternative news.

Celebrities have joined forces with the Occupy Wall Street movement, including Noam Chomsky, rap artist Immortal Technique, Michael Moore and actress Susan Sarandon.

In a related story, MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell is siding with the peaceful protesters who have been abused by the New York City Police Department, stating, "This weekend, a few troublemakers turned a peaceful protest against Wall Street greed into a violent burst of chaos. The troublemakers carried pepper spray and guns and were wearing badges... for not doing anything."

Down on Wall Street




Occupy Wall Street is calling for a just and equitable society.
Over the past two weeks, we’ve seen something unusual and promising: a gathering of people -- mostly young -- who are protesting the corporate power and coarse inequality that characterizes our society and economy. For two weeks, these inspired and inspiring young people, under the banner of Occupy Wall Street, have occupied our attention and camped out in Liberty Plaza.  WFP staff have brought back exciting reports from a demonstration that gets more interesting every day. 

We stand with them in their call for a more just and equitable society.

It’s time to do more than just stand with these protesters. It’s time to walk with them.

This Wednesday, October 5, we will join with allies in labor and community and environmental and on-line groups, tenants and homeowners, workers and free-lancers, musicians and teachers and subway riders and students and anyone else who is sick and tired of the “greed is good” mentality that is destroying our country. We will join the protesters for a Solidarity March. Starting in front of City Hall at 4:30 pm, we’ll march down Wall Street to support the protesters and show the world that the spirit of Wisconsin and Tahrir Square is alive and well in New York City.

Can you join us for the march?

YES.

NO, but I stand with you.

We owe the Occupy Wall Street folks a debt (and we don’t mean a collateralized debt-swap). They have put their bodies on the line, in the rain and the cold, night after night to say: Enough is Enough.

As the demonstrators settle in for the long haul, they need all kinds of support. Most important is showing up. But if you can't come out for Wednesday's march or any other events, you can help in other ways. They need some basic supplies to continue their occupation: sleeping bags, food donations, and simple sanitation supplies like garbage bags.

Will you be there on Wednesday?

Yes:

http://action.workingfamiliesparty.org/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=4817&ows_march=Yes

No but I’ll be there in spirit:

http://action.workingfamiliesparty.org/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=4817&ows_march=No

Standing in solidarity,

Dan Cantor
Executive Director, WFP

P.S. - If you’re not in New York, you can find other events across the country at the Occupy Together website: http://www.occupytogether.org/




Solidarity Alert

Please join AFTRANY as we support DC 37 Local 372, Parents, Teachers, Union Leaders, Community Activists, and Elected Officials in protesting and opposing the layoffs of school staff workers.

Tuesday, Oct. 4 from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
 
(We will be leaving from the AFTRA office located at 260 Madison Avenue at 3:30 p.m.)
The rally will be held at City Hall.

If you cannot meet at the AFTRA office but would like to attend you can take the 4,5,6,N, or R train to City Hall/Brooklyn Bridge or the A or C train to Chambers Street, or the 2 to Park Place and look out for the "AFTRA in Solidarity" signs.

Follow AFTRA:

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

UPDATE: NABET-CWA/ABC-Disney NEGOTIATIONS


B U L L E T I N
NABET-CWA/ABC-Disney NEGOTIATIONS 
Los Angeles, CA
 
BULLETIN #25
September 26, 2011
 
 
On Friday evening September 23rd, NABET-CWA and ABC, Inc. negotiators concluded a scheduled round of bargaining, following six days of meetings.
 
While both parties approached this round of bargaining with the shared goal of reaching a tentative agreement, a successor to the expired Master Agreement has not yet been agreed upon.
 
The Company remained focused on major elements of their previous packages while the Union offered alternatives and counter proposals in several critical and unresolved areas. The parties are still negotiating over open issues such as ENG/EFP digital camera usage, wages and pension.
 
At this point, the parties have not agreed to future bargaining dates but are communicating. We will keep you posted with the latest information and developments.

The Union Bargaining Committee reminds all members to ignore rumors. All official negotiation and mobilization information will be delivered on the Sector website (www.nabetcwa.org), on Local websites, hotlines, and e-mail lists.
 
 
NABET-CWA Network Negotiating Committee

NABET-CWA • 501 3rd Street NW • Washington, DC 20001 • 202-434-1100

Monday, September 26, 2011

Former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum Trashes Unions at GOP Debate

Republican Presidential candidate  Rick Santorum
During Thursday night's Republican presidential debate on Fox News, former Pennsylvania Senator and Republican Presidential candidate  Rick Santorum said:

"We've seen these battles on the state level where unions have bankrupted states from pension plans to here on the federal level. Thirty to 40%, union employees make above their private sector equivalents. I do not believe that state, federal or local workers should be involved in unions."

Broadcast Union News: Frankly, Mr. Santorum's comments show a lack of understanding of organized labor's role in the creation of America's middle class that pales only by his lack of respect for working people in general.


Santorum, a favorite of social conservatives, is a staunch opponent of abortion rights, stem-cell research, unions, and the social safety net. He believes that we are at war with "radical Islam" rather than in a fight with global terrorism. Santorum proudly boasts on his website that he is "one of the most conservative senators in Pennsylvania's history". He served in the U.S. Senate from 1995-2007, and was defeated for a third term by Democrat Bob Casey.

Below is information from an article from the CNN Truth Squad: How Much Do Unions Cost Taxpayers?

The Facts:


-- Overall, unionized workers do earn more than non-union counterparts, according to the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics. Median weekly earnings for full-time union members were $917 in 2010, compared to $717 for non-union workers, the BLS reported in January.

-- The AFL-CIO, the largest U.S. labor federation, says union members make about 30% more than non-union workers. They also are more likely to be covered by health insurance and retirement plans, according to the BLS.

-- Public employees are far more likely to be in unions. Fewer than 7% of private-sector employees were union members in 2010, compared to 36% for government employees, according to the BLS.

-- A BLS report in June found private industry spent an average of $28.13 per hour on wages and benefits, compared to $40.40 for state and local government employees. But it noted that public and private-sector costs "should not be directly compared," as they involved many differences in the types of jobs. Many private-sector employees hold sales and manufacturing jobs not often seen in government, for example, while jobs like teachers make up a greater share of public payrolls.

-- While not quite "bankrupted," as Santorum put it, states, cities and counties are struggling with issues like pension costs as their own revenues have been hard-hit by the 2007-2009 recession and its ongoing hangover, according to the non-profit, non-partisan Center for State and Local Government Excellence, a Washington-based think tank that focuses on public employee pay.

-- While union workers make more in general than non-union workers, a new report from the center found that when total wages and benefits for public employees lag slightly behind private-sector workers, by about 4%. Public pensions and health benefits are more generous, but public employees are more likely to have college degrees and make less than comparable private-sector workers, the study found.

The Verdict:

 Overall, union workers earn more than non-unionized employees, and public employees earn more on average than private-sector workers. But analysts say an apples-to-apples comparison is difficult due to differing occupations, and that many  educated workers in the
public sector could make more in the private sector than in government jobs.

Broadcast Union News: (From www.aflcio.org) By bargaining collectively, union members are able to negotiate higher wages. Union members earn almost 28 percent more than nonunion members. The union wage benefit is greatest for people of color and women. Latino union workers earn almost 51 percent more than their nonunion counterparts. Union women earn almost 34 percent more than nonunion women. For African Americans, the union advantage is 31 percent. The union advantage for white male workers is almost 21 percent. For Asian American workers the union advantage is close to 1 percent. 


In states that have laws restricting workers' rights to form strong unions, the average pay for all workers is lower. So-called "right to work" for less laws that limit workers' rights to collectively bargain contracts (including wages and benefits) are a bad deal for all workers. In 2009, average pay in so-called "right to work" states was 11.1 percent lower than in states where workers have the freedom to form strong unions.
 
Union workers are more likely than their nonunion counterparts to be covered by health insurance, and to receive pension benefits and paid sick leave, according to the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics. In March 2010, 84 percent of union workers were covered by health insurance through their jobs, compared with only 55 percent of nonunion workers. 
 
According to Professor Harley Shaiken of the University of California-Berkeley,[1] unions are associated with higher productivity, lower employee turnover, improved workplace communication, and a better-trained workforce.

Prof. Shaiken is not alone. There is a substantial amount of academic literature on the following benefits of unions and unionization to employers and the economy:
  • Economic Growth
  • Productivity
  • Competitiveness
  • Product or service delivery and quality
  • Training
  • Turnover
  • Solvency of the firm
  • Workplace health and safety
  • Economic development
Economic Growth
During the period 1945-1973, when a high percentage of workers had unions, wages kept pace with rising productivity, prosperity was widely shared, and economic growth was strong. Since 1973, union density and collective bargaining have declined, causing real wages to stagnate despite rising productivity. This decline in union density and bargaining contributed to the current financial crisis and severe recession, as unsustainable asset appreciation and easy credit too the place of wage increases most workers were not getting [2]
Productivity
According to a recent survey of 73 independent studies on unions and productivity: “The available evidence points to a positive and statistically significant association between unions and productivity in the U.S. manufacturing and education sectors, of around 10 and 7 percent, respectively.”[3]

Some scholars have found an even larger positive relationship between unions and productivity.  According to Brown and Medoff, “unionized establishments are about 22 percent more productive than those that are not.”[4] 
Product/ Service Delivery and Quality
According to Professors Michael Ash and Jean Ann Seago [5] heart attack recovery rates are higher in hospitals where nurses are unionized than in non-union hospitals.  According to Professor Paul Clark, nurse unions improve patient care by raising staff-to-patient ratios, limiting excessive overtime, and improving nurse training. [6]

Another study looked at the relationship between unionization and product quality in the auto industry.[7]  According to a summary of this study prepared by American Rights at Work:

“The author examines the system of co-management created through the General Motors-United Auto Workers partnership at the Saturn Corporation…The author credits the union with building a dense communications network throughout Saturn's management system. Compared to non-represented advisors, union advisors showed greater levels of lateral communication and coordination, which had a significant positive impact on quality performance.”

Training

Several studies in have found a positive association between unionization and the amount and quality of workforce training.  Unionized establishments are more likely to offer formal training.[8]  This is especially true for small firms.  There are a number of reasons for this: less turnover among union workers, making the employer more likely to offer training; collective bargaining agreements that require employers to provide training; and finally, unions often conduct their own training.
Turnover
Professor Shaiken also finds that unions reduce turnover.  He cites Freeman and Medoff’s finding that “about one fifth of the union productivity effect stemmed from lower worker turnover.  Unions improve communication channels giving workers the ability to improve their conditions short of ‘exiting.’”[9] 
Solvency
Labor’s enemies assert that unions drive employers out of business, but academic research refutes this claim.  According to Professors Richard Freeman and Morris Kleiner, unionism has a statistically insignificant effect (meaning no effect) on firm solvency.[10]  Freeman and Kleiner conclude “unions do not, on average, drive firms or business lines out of business or produce high displacement rates for unionized workers.”
Workplace Health and Safety
Employers should be concerned about workplace health and safety as a matter of enlightened self-interest.  According to an American Rights at Work summary of a study by John E. Baugher and J. Timmons Roberts:

“Only one factor effectively moves workers who are in subordinate positions to actively cope with hazards: membership in an independent labor union.  These findings suggest that union growth could indirectly reduce job stress by giving workers the voice to cope effectively with job hazards.” [11]
The benefits of unions in terms of safer workplaces are hardly new. According to one most recent study, unions reduced fatalities in coal mining by an estimated 40 percent between 1897 and 1929. [12]
Economic Development
Unions also play a positive role in economic development. One good example is the Wisconsin Regional Training Partnership, “an association of 125 employers and unions dedicated to family-supporting jobs in a competitive business environment. WRTP members have stabilized manufacturing employment in the Milwaukee metro area, and contributed about 6,000 additional industrial jobs to it over the past five years. Among member firms, productivity is way up--exceeding productivity growth in nonmember firms.”[13]


[1] Harley Shaiken, The High Road to a Competitive Economy: A Labor Law Strategy, Center for American Progress, June 25, 2004, pp. 7-8. http://www.americanprogress.org/atf/cf/%7BE9245FE4-9A2B-43C7-A521-5D6FF2E06E03%7D/unionpaper.pdf
[2] Dean Baker, "The Recession and the Freedom to Organize," AFL-CIO Point of View, Feb. 2008
[3] Christos Doucouliagos and Patrice Laroche, “The Impact of U.S. Unions on Producivity: A Bootstrap Meta-analysis,” Proceedings of the Industrial Relations Research Association, 2004.  See also, by the same authors, “What Do Unions Do to Productivity: A Meta-analysis,” Industrial Relations, Volume 42 Issue 4 October 2003:
[4] Charles Brown and James L. Medoff, “Trade Unions in the Production Process.”  Journal of Political
Economy, vol. 86, no. 3 (June 1978): 355–378.
[5] Michael Ash and Jean Ann Seago, “The effect of registered nurses' unions on heart-attack mortality,” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 57, No. 3 (Apr. 2004), pp. 422-442.
[6] Paul Clark and Darlene Clark, "Collective Bargaining in American Hospitals: The Response of Nurse Unions to the Crisis in American Health Care, " LERA, Jan 2009.
[7] Saul A. Rubinstein, “The Impact of Co-Management on Quality Performance: The Case of the Saturn Corporation.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 53, No. 197 (January 2000).
[8] Harley J. Frazis, Diane E. Herz and Michael W. Horrigan, “Employer-Provided Training: Results from a New Survey.”  Monthly Labor Review (May 1995): 3–17.
[9] Harley Shaiken, cited earlier, quoting Richard Freeman and James Medoff, What Do Unions Do?  New York, Basic Books, 1984.
[10] Richard B. Freeman and Morris M. Kleiner, “Do Unions Make Enterprises Insolvent?”  Industrial and Labor Relations Review, vol. 52, no. 4 (July 1999): 510–527.
[11] John E. Baugher and J. Timmons Roberts, “Workplace Hazards, Unions and Coping Styles.”  Labor
Studies Journal, Vol. 29, No. 2 (Summer 2004).
[12] William M. Boal, "The Effect of Unionism on Accidents in US Coal Mining," 1897-1929, 'Industrial Relations,' Vol. 48, No. 1 (Jan. 2009)
[13] Annette Bernhardt, Laura Dresser, and Joel Rogers, “Taking the High Road in Milwaukee: The Wisconsin Regional Training Partnership.”  Working USA, Vol. 5, Issue 3 (January 31, 2002).

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

WPCLB, AFL-CIO Endorses Daraio and Quezada



The Westchester - Putnam Central Labor Body, AFL-CIO endorses Robert Daraio and Manuel Quezada for Village of Ossining Trustees! 

Daraio and Quezada are running on the Democratic, Independence, and Working Family Party lines.

For more information visit








Former WPIX Anchor Jackie Hyland Joins CBS Affiliate WRAL in Raleigh-Durham

By Merrill Knox
TV Spy


Jackie Hyland
Jackie Hyland who left New York City’s WPIX in March 2011, will debut September 27 as evening anchor on WRAL, the CBS-affiliate in Raleigh-Durham.

Hyland’s addition to the news team was announced by the station along with a handful of changes to the talent lineup. Hyland will be paired with longtime WRAL anchor Gerald Owens on the 5:30 p.m. and 10 p.m. newscasts; she will replace anchor Debra Morgan, who will take over the 5 p.m. and 6 p.m. newscasts from Pam Saulsby.

Saulsby, who has been with the station since 1991, is leaving to pursue “other opportunities outside of the station,” according to the WRAL release. She will continue to co-anchor the noon newscast until later this fall, but her final evening newscasts will be later this week.

Also on the move at the station is 5:30 p.m. anchor Cullen Browder, who will shift to full-time reporter once Owens and Hyland take over in that timeslot. “Cullen is an award winning investigative journalist,” WRAL news director Rick Gall said. “We feel our viewers are best served by having him on the street full time exposing waste and wrongdoing.”

WRAL will also debut a renovated newsroom and new weather reporting technology, including a 3D storm tracking system, on the same day.